Natural England has failed to respond to a Freedom of Information request, regarding the shooting of Herring Gulls - in spite of being legally obliged to do so.
I submitted the request, relating to an individual licence, as part of my enquiries into the agency's licensing system, having been advised to do so by Natural England's Operations Director, James Diamond. The licence in question, issued to an applicant in Devon, permitted the shooting of 100 red-listed Herring Gulls and was just one example of many that were approved by the agency. In fact the total number of Herring Gulls killed under similar licences might potentially be several thousand. Herring Gulls are a declining, red-listed species of serious conservation concern, so I was interested to discover the reasons behind Natural England's decision to allow the shooting of thousands of these birds. Information Requested Following Advice From Natural England Operations Director Mr Diamond informed me that this information would have to be obtained through a FOI request, and so I selected a typical individual licence from the agency's data and asked very specifically, as advised by Mr Diamond, for details of the original application together with Natural England's technical assessment. I made it clear that I would like to know the precise reasons provided by the applicant explaining why they felt it was necessary to kill Herring Gulls, together with Natural England's response to the applicant and details of the process via which the agency arrived at their decision to approve lethal control of this red listed species. I also requested return figures if they were available, detailing the numbers of birds finally killed under this individual licence. That was on 5th July. On 6th July I received an acknowledgement from a paralegal at Natural England confirming the following:- "Thank you for your request for the information detailed in your email below, which we received on 5th July 2019. We are dealing with your request under the Environmental Information Regulations 2004. Your request is being considered and we will send out our response within the legal deadline of 20 working days which is 6th August 2019. If, for any reason, we are unable to meet the deadline we will keep you fully informed of the reasons for this." Today is 7th August. The legal deadline has passed. I have not heard from Natural England and so they have failed in their legal responsibility to either provide the information requested or to keep me 'fully informed' of any reasons for not meeting the legal deadline. There may be three reasons for this failure to comply with their legal obligations. It may be because they have information that they prefer to hide. It may be because they don't even know the reasons behind the decision themselves. Or it may be that they are simply so disorganised that they don't have a clue what they are doing. Whatever the reason, this is a massive failure on their part to comply with their legal responsibility. Such blatant disregard for the law is shocking. Where do we go from here? Anybody's guess. But one thing has been made very clear indeed: Natural England are definitely not fit for purpose.
43 Comments
Melanie mills
7/8/2019 10:30:40 am
Let’s hope this goes against them by not responding to a legal request
Reply
Pam Leadbeater
7/8/2019 12:51:08 pm
WHOSE WORLD IS THIS?
Reply
Martin Bell
7/8/2019 03:43:53 pm
The Tories have ensured justice and legal help is only available for the rich.
Sandra Haynes
7/8/2019 01:56:03 pm
Natural England is defently not fit for purpose I hope something is fine about them soon as it was disgusting that they did not reply in time to save all these birds .There has to be an alternative motive.
Reply
Helen Davidson
7/8/2019 06:00:47 pm
Report them to the information commissioner. They can be heavily fined.
Reply
Ronald Teague
29/8/2019 06:39:17 am
where is the rspb what use are they if they cannot protect birds this selfish country sickens me
Reply
Liz Damaschka
7/8/2019 10:36:34 am
They are required, by law, to divulge this information.
Reply
Michael Clarke
7/8/2019 12:45:18 pm
If they are required by law - have they committed a criminal offence? If so, will the directors/trustees be fined or imprisoned?
Reply
Fiona Millward
7/8/2019 10:37:22 am
This is really worrying...thank you stepping up on behalf of those who care and for your continued commitment to this issue!
Reply
Tony Whiting
7/8/2019 10:38:54 am
I agree with you that it’s poor that NE haven’t replied in their timeline. I would like to see a few less Pigeons in the UK, also less Magpies and Grey Squirrels as those 2 both take eggs and young out of small birds nests which reduces the population of small birds slightly.
Reply
7/8/2019 12:18:11 pm
This seems a bizarre argument in this context. By 'pigeons' which species do you mean? Grey squirrels, I agree, but irrelevant here. Incidentally you do not need to say "a few less", 'fewer' would do!
Reply
Peter
7/8/2019 03:57:23 pm
Seriously, you're complaining about grammar? There are more important things at stake here, like the animals!
jeannette brazier.
7/8/2019 03:57:41 pm
There is no need for less pigeons magpies and grey squirrels. Nature should all be left alone.
Reply
Charles David Foulstone
7/8/2019 04:40:18 pm
Sorry Jeanette, but you seem to have forgotten your natural history. The reason we have so many grey squirrels now & so few native reds is because a hundred years ago we DIDN'T leave nature alone, so what happens now? Do we try to redress former interferences, or just sit & live with the consequences.
Dennisa
7/8/2019 10:39:59 am
I note the Head of Natural England is now Tony Juniper, formerly of WWF and FoE. Disappointing.
Reply
D. Swift
7/8/2019 10:47:44 am
I would think they are having great difficulty in explaining the indiscriminate slaughter of our native birds. This on top of the killing of blue tits and other birds that cannot be justified in any possible way.
Reply
Virginia Mc Loughlin
7/8/2019 10:48:51 am
Dear Jason,
Reply
7/8/2019 10:53:58 am
these vile tories seem to be untouchable and do nothing that is legal requirements.when will people open their eyes and see what is NOT been done rather than listen to lie after lie
Reply
David Garnett
7/8/2019 10:51:32 am
Hi Jason
Reply
J M COLE
7/8/2019 11:01:06 am
Spot on Jason. The ICO will logically view this as a constructive breach of the Act and not an oversight, which tends not to Wash anyway. High chance that NE will be censured and fined and rightly so. Must not let this pass.
Reply
Ken Smith
7/8/2019 10:51:38 am
You now need to take this matter up with the Information Commissioners Office https://ico.org.uk/
Reply
Christine Austin
7/8/2019 10:51:49 am
Thank you so much for doing this!
Reply
Ian Williams
7/8/2019 11:01:14 am
This is a total disgrace. Natural England is not above the law and if the law says you jump, you ask how high? Give us the response which is rightfully ours.
Reply
Henry Goodall
7/8/2019 11:03:16 am
So Called 'Natural England' are a law unto themselves.
Reply
Sophie
7/8/2019 11:04:49 am
You need to take legal action. Do you have a lawyer to do this for free ie not free for the sake of our creatures ? You need to make an foi for every single license. A corrupt individual is issuing them .... clearly and making money. There is a market for stuffed animals close to extinction
Reply
Nikki Deavall
7/8/2019 11:09:05 am
Thank you so much for your continued efforts in bringing this to the public's attention. Your efforts are so appreciated
Reply
Stephen Varty
7/8/2019 11:11:57 am
These people should face prosecution as individuals instead of hiding like cowards inside a cocooned organisaton. There should be automatic fines and jail sentences. Why do we need them anyway? Sometimes I think people like this just come up with decisions to justify their needless, species destroying, overpaid jobs! They are no better than the sad bar stewards that go on pheasant shoots!
Reply
Alan Digweed
7/8/2019 11:29:38 am
Have you considered taking the route via the legal system. I have no doubt there are legal guidelines in place for a provider failing to submit a response in time.
Reply
7/8/2019 11:29:49 am
Un-Natural England!! Typical bureaucratic bungling. Definitely not fit for purpose!!
Reply
Debbie Kimble
7/8/2019 11:34:06 am
Time to get MP's involved and start throwing the book at Natural England
Reply
Sarah
7/8/2019 11:48:59 am
They'll be banking on the fact that you won't take them to court, and there aren't enough government funds for anyone official to follow-up, so unless you put your money where your mouth is, it's unlikely it will go anywhere. My advice is to write an intriguing article....find out if there have been any other animals being culled without care, and get it printed in as many newspapers and magazines as will write it up. If it's systematic and widespread, that's the clincher.
Reply
Terry Canham
7/8/2019 11:54:38 am
My guess is that Boris has diverted them all to work on 'no deal Brexit'! More seriously though, I have lost all faith in the motives and motivation of Natural England. I've seen too many questionable examples of their decision making, particularly around landing issues. They need investigating, independently and fully.
Reply
Terry Canham
7/8/2019 12:01:16 pm
Sorry, in my earlier post I meant Planning Issues, not Landing Issues. Wretched prescriptive text!
Reply
Jan Webb
7/8/2019 12:03:22 pm
Who are Natural England and do they speak on behalf of the Nation. If the head of them used to be with WWF where is there compassion for the beautiful wildlife in this country. I am appalled at this situation.
Reply
Eva Ferlez
7/8/2019 12:50:45 pm
Dear Jason
Reply
satya
7/8/2019 01:31:15 pm
under law they should be fined. Well worth pursuing
Reply
7/8/2019 02:16:09 pm
If its a legal obligation that has not been met, is that an offence? Who governs the law that has been broken and will they bring Natural England to court to face charges? Or will it get lost in a mountain of paperwork and never come to court? Is it necessary to bring a private action?
Reply
B H Wykes
7/8/2019 04:23:05 pm
Failure to comply with a legal request requires enforcement of the law. For what other purpose is legislation and the dubious means we have for enforcement?
Reply
Carole Sutton
7/8/2019 06:35:56 pm
Well there's a surprise - they are thumbing their noses at us all.
Reply
D.Jackson
7/8/2019 11:44:14 pm
Mr. Enfield, you need to calm down and stop using such emotive language about a failure to meet a statutory time lime, which I belive was miscalculated, although today is clearly passed the response date. The failure is in providing a response or stating the need for an extension.
Reply
Pamela Allen
8/8/2019 11:04:29 am
In Full Agreement Jason, Natural England is in breach of their FOI public duty, necessitating unfortunate further but necessary action.
Reply
Debbie Macmillan
9/8/2019 02:43:17 pm
You've done really well to uncover a Quango where no honest records are kept and they do not care how many birds are being cruelly slaughtered by those hunters they gave a licence to. I hope they are put on the 'bonfire' of quangoes which David Cameron agreed to but I believe only one was dismissed! :(
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
If you appreciate what I write about, please consider showing your support by buying me a virtual coffee!
Click the button below! Thanks :) Archives
July 2023
|