|
IMPORTANT UPDATE: 7/12/24 @ 17.35pm:-
Following the publication of this blog post (below), I have just heard from the office of Minister Creagh, with an apology for not having responded sooner. I have been assured that the matter has been picked up, and escalated, and that the issues raised in our petition are being looked into with policy officials in Defra and Natural England. I've also been informed that a formal response from the Minister will be shared with me shortly, once internal discussions on this have finished. So, excellent progress. Thanks to every one of you who has shared, commented and helped to get our concerns noticed. I'll be in touch again when I have a further update. Best, Jase *************************************************************************** As our landmark petition reaches 400,727 signatures, the UK's official Minister for Nature has failed to acknowledge the concerns of the country's wildlife campaigners. I reported on my blog last month that I had written to Mary Creagh, the UK's new Minister for Nature, on behalf of the hundreds of thousands of people who support our campaign; we are calling for an overhaul and reform of the UK's current wildlife licensing system, a system that facilitates the mass culling of wildlife in the UK. Our work has focused on two government agencies, Natural England and NatureScot, both of which issue lethal control licences to 'manage' wildlife. In particular we have concerns over the licences affecting wild birds. Some of these licences are issued for contentious and often spurious reasons, and include those that allow culling species of high conservation concern. UK's nature lovers feel 'snubbed' by minister Our campaign began back in 2018, and since then we have managed to achieve some significant changes to the system, not least ensuring the transparency of data by persuading Natural England and NatureScot to publish regular licence declarations, thereby allowing the public to see and scrutinize details of the controversial licences. This has allowed us to raise concerns over individual licences and enabled discussions with the authorities responsible. So you might have thought that the UK's Minister for Nature, whose remit includes responsibility for 'domestic biodiversity', would be interested in the opinions of 400,000 people who love nature. I've written to the minister twice now, on behalf of the good folks who have signed our petition, and have not even had the courtesy of an acknowledgement. It feels like a snub for the hundreds of thousands of people who care passionately about this country's wildlife - and begs the question as to what 'Minister for Nature' actually means. We are a large group of good people who are worried about the state of nature in the UK, we see our precious wildlife being destroyed before our eyes - and we have a Minister for Nature who has apparently ignored our polite and respectful request for our concerns to be noted and acknowledged. Follow the money? As mentioned earlier, the minister's remit includes responsibility for 'domestic biodiversity' and indeed she is also the 'lead for Natural England', so you might assume she'd be interested in the views of a huge number of genuine nature lovers who have worked very hard to bring about changes to the failing system. The minister's job description also includes responsibility for 'green finance', whatever that means. Perhaps money takes priority over nature, (something we see time and time again in this country). Whatever the reason for the minister's silence, we can only speculate for now. It would certainly be helpful to know her thoughts on the current licensing system, how she views nature in the UK, and what she intends to do to protect 'domestic biodiversity'. Alas, we might never know. People power - a powerful force for good It is really disappointing that the government's minister for nature has not responded to the voices of those striving to protect nature in the UK. What our campaign has achieved so far is incredible, what we can accomplish together going forward can be just as impressive. The wildlife of the UK relies on us, as individuals, doing what we can on the ground - it might be that the government doesn't care, but we do and that is a more powerful force for good than any government minister could ever hope to be. The campaign continues.
37 Comments
Helen Baker
7/12/2024 01:10:09 pm
Can we all email her directly demanding to know why she has not responded to this letter and petition?
Reply
Sue Willis
7/12/2024 01:26:44 pm
Great idea - along with other questions I often write off to
Reply
Andrew Taylor
7/12/2024 01:57:26 pm
Please can Mary Creagh, the UK's new Minister for Nature explain why she has not responded to Jason Endfield's letter about her lack of response to our petition signed by over 400,727 people to date. Our petition concerns the review and reform of wildlife licensing laws which result in mass culling of our already struggling wildlife with countryside habitats depleted by excessive housebuilding on green belt and blood sports killers allowed free run to cruelly hunt down animals. Enforcing respect and care for and protecting our wildlife should be at the top of the agenda for the new Minister for Nature. It needs a special person with an understanding of the plight of wildlife in our countryside for this vital job to help out wildlife when all the odds are against them?
Reply
Julia Lowe
7/12/2024 04:10:49 pm
I emailed today and got this reply
Reply
Eileen Worthington
7/12/2024 09:25:37 pm
Absolutely disgraceful killing wildlife. Not yours to kill. All Gods creatures are precious just like human life. Shame on you. Karma
Reply
Thomas Crook
7/12/2024 01:11:49 pm
Bloody cheek the government ministers are forgetting they do our bidding not their irresponsible acts
Reply
Lesley Patterson
7/12/2024 01:13:32 pm
This is disgraceful. She should at least have the decency to acknowledge the submission. Maybe she has rich friends who like shooting birds.....
Reply
Barry Armstrong
7/12/2024 01:13:55 pm
TYPICAL POLITITIAN,...... THICK AS PIGSHIT!!!
Reply
ANDREW BERRY
7/12/2024 01:17:34 pm
What's her name Jason?
Reply
Kit
7/12/2024 01:18:02 pm
I voted Labour in the hope that we would have government that would finally listen to the citizens of this country and not the powerful money oriented corporations and individuals who formerly had the ear of government.
Reply
Julia Lowe
7/12/2024 02:02:23 pm
Sorry Kit, they have already taken money away from pensioners, take lots of freebies from funders and taxing workers via increase in NI to employers. Yet handed out huge wage increases to train drivers who are already well paid and to junior doctors, who also are reasonably paid. Angela Rayner has already said she wants to reform planning regs so that swathes of countryside can be built on. So I doubt nature etc. is on this governments agenda.
Reply
Xristian
7/12/2024 03:51:37 pm
Pensioners in receipt of Pension Credit will receive the fuel payment, and this group has been expanded, so the people not getting the fuel payment are comparatively well off. The government has also announced an investigation into pensioner poverty, so is looking to address the matter. All MPs receive gifts and donations, and as long as everything is declared there is no law or rule being broken, this is a non-story for the sake of scoring political points. Starmer, rightly in my view, observed that he accepts tickets from the FA because he can no longer sit in the usual spaces - the cost in security detail to the public purse would be mind-boggling, so fair enough. No one is being investigated for any wrongdoing, while the tories are up to their eyeballs in corruption and abuse of privilege, with investigations on various fronts. Junior doctors and train drivers work hard and bear heavy responsibilities, their pay didn't increase for years, and the rises aren't "huge" if you understand that they are phased over years including backdating for those years they had 0% rise. Doctors can earn more in private practice, so it's already clear that the NHS pays below market value, while train drivers evidently get paid what is the market value rate.
GJ Bibby
7/12/2024 01:18:56 pm
Mary Creagh MP is clearly not fit for government or the position she holds
Reply
Stephen Rudge
7/12/2024 01:22:35 pm
The brazen refusal to even acknowledge the request is shocking for someone who is supposed to care about our endangered wildlife.
Reply
Julia Lowe
7/12/2024 02:03:24 pm
Probably never, all out for themselves
Reply
John Hines
7/12/2024 01:25:52 pm
Typical of Politicians they are ignorant about the suffering of Birds Wild life and Countryside This government are completely devoid of all sympathy and thought for the need more than ever for the protection of our country and
Reply
7/12/2024 01:31:26 pm
Whilst I agree with Helen about emailing Mary Creagh, Governments of all creeds seem to have the knack of losing, forgetting about emails. Perhaps if only 100,000 of the 400,000 sent an old-fashioned letter, it would be harder to ignore.
Reply
Julia Lowe
7/12/2024 02:04:18 pm
People have sent letters and also ignored
Reply
Julia Mary Dance
7/12/2024 01:32:02 pm
I will send her another email via her department. We need supporters in her constituancy, individually and as members of local groups, schools etc., to email her as their MP. These have a better chance of getting responses.
Reply
Philip Gilbert
7/12/2024 01:43:03 pm
Sorry to this day I voted Labour.
Reply
Julia Lowe
7/12/2024 02:09:48 pm
I didn't vote Labour as I knew they would lie about so many things. The fact that even before a budget the Chancellor took away the Winter Fuel payment, yet gave above inflation pay rises to train drivers says it all!! Also the Deputy prime Minister wants to change planning laws so that great swathes of countryside, including ones with endangered wildlife, are built on. I despair
Reply
Carol Goulding
7/12/2024 01:45:18 pm
If you thought the ‘other lot’ were bad you’re going to be even more disappointed by this bunch of lying low life’s.
Reply
Julia Lowe
7/12/2024 02:05:07 pm
Totally agree
Reply
John de Carteret
7/12/2024 02:09:42 pm
Carol Goulding. This kind of abusive and dismissive language will do nothing to help any Government ministers to listen to the valid concerns of so many of us.
Reply
Roger Wilson-Tucker
7/12/2024 01:59:49 pm
I agree with all, particularly, here, those who have used the word `disgrace'. If Government Ministers treat electors - or any correspondents - with contempt, they should be removed from office.
Reply
William Thompson
7/12/2024 02:06:52 pm
I find it incredible that someone who it seems holds such a low opinion of our natural heritage, should be placed in a situation where she can be responsible for the care and nurture of our countryside and all that it entails.. She evidently cares nothing for our natural heritage. Who on earth gave her this job?
Reply
Kim Jarvis
7/12/2024 03:50:17 pm
I don't live in the UK, so I don't know how your government works. Can you request an appointment with her or attend a session of Parliament and express your opinion? If you can, I strongly encourage you to do both.
Reply
7/12/2024 03:54:05 pm
What is Kier Starmer thinking when he chooses his ministers?
Reply
Andy Astill
7/12/2024 03:57:00 pm
If you look at her website, there is little mention of wildlife, if any! https://www.marycreagh.co.uk/#about
Reply
harry teyn
7/12/2024 04:33:54 pm
these people in our lousy government are only interested in
Reply
Mike Nield
7/12/2024 04:42:03 pm
I have tried to find information regarding the ministers knowledge of wildlife or the natural environment in general.I cannot find anything.
Reply
Kathleen Danby
7/12/2024 09:05:01 pm
This "Not my constituent" excuse is just that - an excuse. It's true that there is this rule, but MPs use it for their own disinclination to take any action. Not every concern falls only within one specific constituency, and this one certainly doesn't.
Reply
Gail Hopkins
8/12/2024 10:24:30 am
I have emailed the Minister politely asking for a speedy response.
Reply
Sue Willis
8/12/2024 03:07:13 pm
I see on Mary Creagh Gov.uk site - one of her titles is
Reply
Sue Willis
8/12/2024 03:07:38 pm
I see on Mary Creagh Gov.uk site - one of her titles is
Reply
Sue Willis
8/12/2024 03:08:50 pm
I see on Mary Creagh Gov.uk site - one of her titles is
Reply
Robert Bromley
14/12/2024 10:20:52 am
You appear to have hit the same brick wall I have encountered Jason. It would appear a lot of the new MPs are steadfastly refusing to have any sort of dialogue with anyone who approaches them with anything challenging.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
If you would like to support what I do, you can either buy me a virtual coffee or leave me a tip, just click one of the links below - and Thank You!
Archives
April 2026
|
Disclaimer:-
The views and opinions expressed on this blog are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any other agency, organisation, employer or company. Assumptions made in the analysis are not reflective of the position of any entity other than the author(s) - and since we are critically-thinking human beings, these views are always subject to change and rethinking at any time.
Comments on this website are the sole responsibility of their writers.
This is a personal weblog. We make no representations as to accuracy, completeness, correctness, suitability or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors or omissions.
All information is provided on an as-is basis. It is the reader's responsibility to verify their own facts.
Please note that all content on this blog is copyright and may only be reproduced with the express permission of the author.
RSS Feed