|
* Does Natural England's reliance on the 'good practice' of licence holders really work?
* How many licence holders fulfill their obligation to file a report of action taken? * I've asked Natural England to provide a figure.... How many returns, that is to say 'reports of action taken', are received by Natural England for the thousands of bird control licences that they issue? Anyone carrying out licensed bird control, that has been approved by Natural England, is obliged under the terms of their licence to complete and submit a return, detailing the action they have taken, including the numbers of birds shot, eggs destroyed etc. But how many licence holders actually fulfill this obligation? "We rely on the 'good practice' of licence holders...." I was told some time ago by then operations director, James Diamond, that Natural England relies on the 'good practice' of licence holders to act responsibly in filing their returns. And there are apparently no significant penalties for those that don't. Basically it is a system that depends on the honesty and integrity of licence holders, and so it is a system that is bound to fail on occasion. Public dismay at Starling cull Recently I uncovered a case where a farmer had been granted licences by Natural England to cull Starlings over a period of at least ten years, in spite of the fact that at one point he had allegedly shot Starlings without a valid licence and that he had apparently failed to submit the obligatory return for at least one year. This case raised many questions about just how widespread the misuse of licences really is. When I broke this story, there was much public indignation and many people contacted me to express their dismay that this could have happened. Doubts over the competence of Natural England seem to be growing. The question of licence returns.... A few days ago I asked Natural England's Director for wildlife licensing if he could provide me with details of how many returns had been received by Natural England for bird control licences that were issued during the year 2018-19. In other words, I want to find out what percentage of licence holders do actually submit their returns. It's a fairly straightforward way of assessing the credibility of the process. At the time of writing, I am still awaiting a reply. Perhaps the figures are not readily to hand, or maybe Natural England would rather we didn't know... But I will pursue this information as I think it is in the public interest to know how watertight the licensing system is in practice. My hope, of course, is that the vast majority of licence holders do submit accurate returns, on time. My fear is that there may be many who fail to act with the 'good practice' on which Natural England relies... I will update in due course......
47 Comments
|
If you would like to support what I do, you can either buy me a virtual coffee or leave me a tip, just click one of the links below - and Thank You!
Archives
October 2025
|
Disclaimer:-
The views and opinions expressed on this blog are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any other agency, organisation, employer or company. Assumptions made in the analysis are not reflective of the position of any entity other than the author(s) - and since we are critically-thinking human beings, these views are always subject to change and rethinking at any time.
Comments on this website are the sole responsibility of their writers.
This is a personal weblog. We make no representations as to accuracy, completeness, correctness, suitability or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors or omissions.
All information is provided on an as-is basis. It is the reader's responsibility to verify their own facts.
Please note that all content on this blog is copyright and may only be reproduced with the express permission of the author.

RSS Feed